-
Website
http://www.eagletribune.com/ -
Original page
http://www.eagletribune.com/permalink/local_story_248020509.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
skepsis22
983 comments · 356 points
-
BibleProphecy
1284 comments · 173 points
-
kat333
1729 comments · 579 points
-
Commentard
2625 comments · 872 points
-
Shadowen
2458 comments · 2356 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Windham representative leads fight against gay marriage
2 days ago · 471 comments
-
Library custodian says he grew pot for personal use
1 day ago · 105 comments
-
Chief assessor Vega demoted by Lantigua
1 day ago · 90 comments
-
Three fired on Lantigua's first day
1 day ago · 165 comments
-
Police: Andover library custodian booked on pot growing charges
1 day ago · 140 comments
-
Windham representative leads fight against gay marriage
Can John McCain win? Look, I've never cared for the guy. He wasn't my guy in this fight and I've never made any secret about that.
But now I've got to be with him - even though the odds are still against him, although not nearly as long as they were awhile ago. What will tip it? This election all depends whether the "victims" finally outnumber the non-victims.
There's an old saying in politics. If you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on Paul's vote. Barack Obama doesn't know much, but he's figured that out. The question is: Are there still more Peters than Pauls (all of whom feel entitled, because they are, of course, victims)?
Consider the Democratic convention. Even Joe Biden, that shameless buffoon from America's newest twin city, Scranton-Wilmington, tried to stake out his own personal turf in Victim Nation.
You see, Joe Biden stuttered as a youth. The introductory video told us that. Then his son repeated it. Then the great man himself c-c-c-c-copped to it.
In Victim Nation, nobody ever got a break, even if they've gotten nothing but free rides their entire lives. No graduate of Harvard Law School can credibly claim to have been oppressed by a "mean" nation. So in their speeches, Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and Deval Patrick all just ignored the inconvenient truth about where they picked up their second Ivy League degrees.
It's amazing. These biographical rewrites are like a Witness Protection Program for Harvard Law grads who want to change their identities in order to pass themselves off as victims in good standing.
The whole Democratic convention was like that ancient TV show "Queen for a Day," in which three weepy housewives would each try to top the others with tales of domestic woe.
The faux bathos in Denver was what made Sarah Palin so refreshing on Friday. When she started listing her kids, you cringed if you'd read about her infant son with Down syndrome. After four nights of Rocky Mountain Queen for a Day, you just assumed she'd Biden-ize the story.
But when she got to her infant son, she said nothing about his affliction. Then she introduced her husband, not even mentioning that he has Inuit blood. That makes the Palins, gulp, multiracial. Imagine any Democrat in Denver neglecting such a perfect opportunity to play the race card. You can't.
Todd Palin is someone who actually works for a living, as opposed to the Democrats' "working families," many of whom don't really work, and whose taxes Barack promised to cut, which will be difficult, considering most of them don't pay income taxes to begin with.
By contrast, Todd Palin has two real jobs. He's no "community advocate" or some paper shuffler in "HR." The guy is a commercial fisherman and he also works in the oil fields. Naturally the Beautiful People scoff.
The Democrats and their mainstream-media minions are keeping a close eye on the Weather Channel this morning. It's no secret what they'll do if Gustav lands a direct hit on New Orleans. It'll be all victim, all the time, all week.
Remember Stutterin' Joe Biden's acceptance speech, in which, to no one's surprise, he invented a whole series of imaginary kitchen-table conversations, one of which involved "Mom" moving in with her kids "now that Dad's gone"?
Wouldn't it be great if Sarah Palin points out in her speech that one reason Mom can't afford to live in her own house anymore is because her property taxes have tripled to pay for the salaries and benefits of avaricious public-sector union members?
Talk about the real victims in Victim Nation. It's the people who are going to have to pick up the tab if Barack wins - the taxpayers.
Again, the recurring question: Are there still more of us than there are of them?
Written by Howie Carr as it appeared in the Boston Herald on 8/31/08.
The rich get paid over and over again with Bush/McCain tax cuts.In the end, a greater percent of the tax burden gets shifted onto the middle class. You may think that check they cut you is worth something (although most people just use it to pay off debt or buy crap at WalMart) but in the end, it evens out to hurt the middle class expect for the top percentiles of the middle class who get shifted up.
I have asked this question repeatedly and not gotten an answer from any McCain supporter. John McCain has promised to bring fiscal responsibility back to Washington.
What spending John McCain will cut to balance the budget and pay for his tax cuts plus the already staggering Bush deficit? Do not say earmarks, because earmarks make up less than 1% of the federal budget and about as much as we are spending in Iraq every month.
Hey Jeff, can you answer my question about McCain's plan to balance the budget?
Obama gets into office, and your 2 cents will quickly be devalued to .05 cents.
If Obama got his way, we would in fact become the equivalent of a third-world country, with a large swath of the population entirely dependent on the government for assistance. That assistance would be paid for with the high taxes that we, the working people of this country would be forced to contribute under Obama's plan.
How's Air America doing?
A few things guaranteed if Obama is president:
1) More dependency at the expense of the Average American. More free handouts for people who don't want to work hard and prosper. Average Americans who work hard with 1 or more jobs will have to foot the bill for this with increased taxes.
2) Treating people as non-equals will be alive and well via affirmative action.
It looks as though more people will choose to rob Peter to pay Paul, at least that's what most of the polls are saying today. Four years from now, Americans are going to wonder what they've done to America to make it a 3rd world country.
Affirmative action exists for women too, not just minorities. And Obama, recognizing his daughters have advantages white kids from lower income places do not, has promised to change affirmative action to a class-based rather than race-based system, something I wholeheartedly support.
I know a bit about AA and college admissions, and if what you tell me about your kids is true, you have NOTHING to fear. If your kids are valedictorian and salutatorian at a decent sized public school (I won't ask which one, but all the public schools in the Merrimack Valley fit into this category) and have SAT scores corresponding to their grades they will get into almost any college they apply to, and will certainly not be pushed out in favor of a black/Hispanic kid with mediocre grades/SAT's. As a mother of two overachieving kids, you should also know many schools and local organizations will give your children hefty scholarships (apply for every single one you can find), and might want to read up on Obama's American Opportunity Tax Credit.
I am applying to law school (visit any message board on law school admissions and you'll find dozens of heated debates on the merits of AA) soon and trust me, your fears are way overblown. Affirmative action in undergraduate admissions is more of a "tie-breaker," just like AA for the rich (or legacy admissions, see Bush) or for athletes- from my experiences and knowledge a kid applying to the top undergrad schools has more to fear from legacies/athletes taking undeserved spots than minorities.
My parents grew up poor but worked hard to get somewhere in life. They didn't ask for handouts. I, in turn, did the same and expect my two kids to work hard to get ahead in life. Why should we be punished with higher taxes?
The rich you are speaking about are the top 5% of Americans. I pay my own family health insurance, a mortgage, and bills like everyone else. We have a family household income of over $50,000. I am trying to figure out how to send my two girls to college in two years because we can't afford it. They are number 1 and 2 in their class but that won't matter if Obama is president because some kid who doesn't work as hard as my kids do will be chosen above them because they meet the skin color of the week. Not fair. ANY child, regardless of color or sex should get into college if they work hard. My question is what happened to personal responsibility and working hard?
I
Yes, you should to be smart to be President. It's only practical to entrust our country to a person who is more than just an average man or woman. Ideally, the President should be more intelligent than 99% of the people in this country. The Founding Fathers were not people you would "sit down and have a beer with," nor were they trust fund babies. They were accomplished, highly intelligent, well read and part of a very tiny (elite) segment of society.
One of the biggest misconceptions is that Republicans give tax breaks to large corporations. Yes, that is true, and those tax breaks help those companies be able to afford new hires. When crazy liberals tax those businessmen heavily, all businesses large and small, from giant retailers to mom & pop stores can't afford to hire many people. Do liberals want to create jobs? NO! They want you to not have a job so you can get on one of their taxpayer funded programs!
Obama is a nightmare! A potential four year nightmare!
Liberals don't want anyone to actually succeed. If anyone was actually helped by this party, they'd be outta business. They will always keep those dependent on the government and its programs.
Obama would provide $80 billion in tax breaks, mainly for poor workers and the elderly, including tripling the Earned Income Tax Credit for minimum-wage workers and higher credits for larger families.
He also would raise income taxes, capital gains and dividend taxes on the wealthiest. He would raise payroll taxes on taxpayers with incomes above $250,000, and he would raise corporate taxes. Small businesses that make more than $250,000 a year would see taxes rise.
Another hypocritical righty just like the VPilf.
Obama's Senate Bill S.2433 - A UN Global Tax on the U.S. Senator Obama wants to tie the U.S. into spending millions, if not billions, on Global Poverty. His Senate Bill S-2433, along with the already passed House version, never mentions the money involved, and for good reason. They don’t want anyone to know how much the money would be. The attempt at hiding the money in this Bill is ingenious to say the least.
My standard of living has fallen enough. Charity begins at home, Senator Obama!
C'mon Stan - stop being such a "hater".
"It will serve the Republicans right to have the NUCULAR OPTION used against them when we have a large Democratic majority in both houses. And it will be great to see how Hillary behaves when she no longer has to suck up to the voting public. She might be fantastic as a justice. And she won't be in Bill's shadow any more. She can finally do something Bill hasn't done (and will never be able to do).
Bill Nolan | 05.23.08 10:57 AM"
And: "I can't recall when "the best legal mind" was ever a parameter to be used to choose a SCOTUS nominee. Look at Clarence T or more recently Roberts/Alito. It is always a a policy decision, not a legal decision. Hillary has drifted to the Right because she wanted to appear more electable. Without having to cater to ignorant voters, she can be as liberal as she truly was in Bill's first term. That would be a thorn in the Repubicans' side for 20 plus years!
Bill Nolan | 05.23.08 11:45 AM"
Now, look into the faces of your children and explain to them how you lie about being a "lifelong republican" (you were also on the hillary clinton campaign email list)
Thanks for the comments, everybody. I appreciate them all, both positive and negative.
Suuuuuuuure.
Look it up, folks... it's not hard to find the number of Bill Nolans in the Salem phone book. At least two. If you look outside Salem, there are more. Go figure.
And sorry, folks... he's a real guy. Dealing with real issues, as are we all, and I've watched him go (almost agonizingly) from a party guy to sticking his neck out for Obama this election.
Bill has been a part of the local community for a number of years, being a lifelong resident of Salem as well. If you choose to hide behind the "not a real person, don't listen to him" screen, it's your choice. Keep your fingers in your ears for another term.
Vote Republican and get more of the same. DISASTER!!!
McCain Is against abortion, but for women's rights. He's against killing innocent children, but pro killing other people's children to win a war for oil. Hmm, tough decision.
Don't make me explain them all to you.
Next time I will type slower s o y o u u n d e r s t a n d :?)
Right. Like Obama and the Democrats tell the truth. At least with John McCain we'll have someone who really has been a leader and understands the world. Obama: give me a break.
Andover: the merrimack valley epi-center of elitism and cluelessness.
Now Joe Biden...ask him the same question....what is his recollection of those plagerism ethics questions?????
Who are the liars????
When asked if she smoked pot...Palin as well as Obama indicated that they had as youngsters....your god...Bill, husband of Hill, said...I took a drag, but I didn't inhale....
Who is the liar? Give me a break....one was a conclusion based on the best available information...one was a straight out lie.......
Take off the Kerry/Edwards bumper sticker from your Volvo and read the actual paper from a source other than the NY Times.....
I know Bill personally and even if I was in the same room with him hearing those comments about Hilary come out of his mouth, I'd be looking around for the ventriloquist because that is how much they don't sound like him.
Personally, I'm a life long democrat, but I've voted for a Republican when I thought he was the best person for the job. That is especially true for me when it comes to the highest office in the land. I look first and last at the person who is running, not his or her party affiliation.
Obama has real family values, he has a mainstream sense of values that I connect with. I do not recognise the GOP since the days of Bush and Rove. Obama has a direction and a plan for the future economy of this country, whereas McCain doesn't believe we have an economic crisis at all.
I wanted to vote McCain, but he is to closely aligned w/ the Bush policies of the past 8 years and his VP running mate, Palin, both lacks family values and any sense of crediblity to lead. Had he picked Pawlenty of MN, or even Olympia Snow of ME, I might have seen a chance to regain the GOP back from the fundementalist right wing christians who are as dangerous as islamic extremist.
Obama- our last chance to reverse the curse of the Bush family attempting to end the world with bullying and fear.
Obama should stick to academia or run for Prime Minister of Sweden where they like paying 70% income tax.
Yes Barack Hussein Obama is a great, eloquent speaker. He can surely entertain a good crowd and spew the "change" and "hope" talk. He is certainly all for change. Communism is absolutely change. As a Republican, you should be ashamed of yourself for not hearing what he is really saying... This man is a domestic enemy to the constitution, he is a danger to the security of the United States of America, his "change" when scrutinized is literally on the border between socialism and communism. Do some research into his limited votes and rethink your decision to support this terrorist!
You better get a grip soon - stop trying to tell us you're a Republican - you never have been a Republican and never will be. You don't just hear a speech and suddenly change your mind.
Unless of course you are a Obama supporter - have been from the start and thought it would be cute to say you're a "lifelong Republican". Sorry - go sell crazy somewhere else Bill - we're all stocked up here.
..."Obama has no experience in running anything, except his mouth....."
Mistakes were made, but show me a war in which they were not. During WWII we lost more men preparing for the invasion of D-Day than we have lost in this entire war both in Iraq and Afghanistan. If the libs were around back then, I wonder where we'd be or what language we'd be speaking today.
Our brave men and woman are fighting to preserve the rights of freedom, both here and across the globe. That has been the American way for over 200 years. Now, I would like you to be around the day Nobama pulls our troops out before the war is completed. I want you to be there when that poor mother learns that her child died in veign. Another six months or a year to really complete the job and you're willing to pull the plug, only to have ome other generation deal with the next tirant.
Under Clinton, these rogue countries were thumbing their noses at us. It was one debacle after another. We had the World Trade Center bombings, embassies bombed, hostages taken off cruise ships and murdered and our war ships were bombed. What was the response. I'll tell you the response. It was to lay a red carpet from Boston to the World Trade Centers, the Pentagon and other locations. It was an invitation to do as they please, because after all, God forbid we should strike at the heart of the problem for fear we might cause bad relations with France and the like. At least under Bush this has not happened again. My kids sleep well at night, as do yours. And to those families that have sacrificed with the loss of a son or a daughter, or to those families who have loved ones serving in the military, whether over seas or not, I thank you from the bottom of my heart.
Now go out there and do the right thing. Don't be misguided by the leftist media that forces so much of their side down your throat that you start to believe it. Do your own homework. Read about history and how it always repeats itself if you let it. Lets start standing up for what is right in this world and don't let those little rogue nations start pulling the strings.
Go McCain!!!
From Bush's national address to start the war:
Our nation enters this conflict reluctantly, yet our purpose is sure. The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder.
We will meet that threat now with our Army, Air Force, Navy, Coast Guard and Marines, so that we do not have to meet it later with armies of firefighters and police and doctors on the streets of our cities.
Now that conflict has come, the only way to limit its duration is to apply decisive force. And I assure you, this will not be a campaign of half measures and we will accept no outcome but victory.
Each paragraph is a lie;
1- threatens peace with weapons of mass murder. -NO WMD
2- meet the threat now....so we won't have to meet it in our cities. - NO TIES BETWEEN IRAQ AND TERRORISTS THAT WOULD HIT OUT CITIES
3. -not be a campaign of half measures- CLEARLY IT HAS BEEN BEMOANED BY ALL OF THE TOP MILITARY COMMANDERS THAT WE WENT IN WITHOUT A GOOD PLAN, NOT ENOUGH TROOPS, ETC.
So while I believed in the war, wanted saddam gone, was waiting for the glorious welcome from the liberated citizens of Iraq, etc.
And it was liberals who started WWI and WWII, so where would we be, as you ask, if the liberals were around back then- I guess we'd be here enjoying the freedoms you talked so much about, thank you democratic leaders.
Now I 100% believe we must finish the job in Iraq, to leave now would be like walking out of the dry forest after dropping a box of lit matches. I also believe in a strong military, projecting force around the world and that this country, for good or bad, is needed to be the major enforcer in this world. But your rhatoric and inspirational speach is full of typical talk radio and fear mongering ideas about the crazy left liberals and the end of all things American.
I have considered McCain in the past as a man willing to straddle the differences of the otherwise crazy lefties and the fundamentalism freakies of the right, because no one, come election time, can consider that there is some middle ground and a vote for one over the other automatically makes you the farthest from center loon there is, and all facts are skewed and recited to prove some point about the end of the world is coming if we vote X or Y. It's getting old and boring and shows that a person can not think critically for themselves, only can recite the parties standard credo like a zombie.
Point out I did it too, whatever, but rousing Bill Pullman-like speeches are for Hollywood.
obama is like a pillow case full of warm fluffy feathers.
Jesus is the real thing
Do you have children? Do you know what they are doing every second of every day? People do not "allow" their children to become impregnated or to do the impregnation; it just happens, and it can happen to anyone. I also didn't realize that hockey players were somehow members of the "lessers" in the gene pool. You might want to call Ray Bourque or Bobby Orr and mention that to them.
If you're going to use this as a definitive way to measure Gov. Palin's abilities, then you really are as ignorant and stupid as your post makes you seem.
What about Zeus, or Thor? They are as real as Jesus is. Throw in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny and all bases are covered.
Obama chides McCain for his Hollywood-like celebrity, yet it is the same Hollywood that is crowing for Obama. I can't take my political advice from a group of celebrities famous for playing make believe. I think someone else played make believe last week as he stood in front of a series of Greek columns trying to portray himself as the second coming of MLK. Mr. Obama, you are no MLK. That was nothing but a self indulgent display of utmost conceitedness. Obama has NO experience to lead this country, none. His record is spotless because he has yet to get his hands dirty. The only thing more disturbing to me than this was that Democratic rally, err, I mean funeral for Paul Wellstone.
We need an ability to cross party lines to get things done. It won't happen. McCain gets bashed from both sides of the aisle when he tries to do it. Obama just wouldn't do it...he is too much of a liberal party-line guy. So to compare them both, I'd rather have those that have tried and succeeded than those that would not even consider bipartisan ideas.
The Senator also believes that poor Americans have a basic right to free health care and monetary supplements from the government with no strings attached. The American substance abuser, for example, would derive the same benefit as a hard working, laid off worker would. Again, classic liberalism. No judgments made regarding entitlements.
God help him.
excerpted from Bill O'Riley
The truth is, after three failed attempts to sell the $2.7 million plane on Ebay, she found a private broker to sell the plane for $2.1 million, a nice $600,000 loss.
Why did they feel the need to lie about this?
Cite your facts. Show us a credible link that verifies your information. It's not truth just because you say it is.
The point you did not address is why are McCain and Palin lying about selling the plane on Ebay for a profit? They could say they dumped the plane at a loss to avoid paying the cost of keeping it grounded, but I guess that didn't sound good enough, hence the lies.
In regards to the plane, in the end there is a profit. There is no more fuel costs on the plain, no maintenance. They don't need to pay the pilot(s) any more. No costs to hanger the plane, landing fees... I bet they made up that 600k in a short amount of time by not having the plane.
I asked for a *credible* link, not an opinion about an opinion. If there are "plenty of links to pick from," why this particular one?
This link is written by Steve Benen, a partisan liberal currently blogging for the Washington Monthly, another liberal blog/e-zine that is long on hysterics and hyperbole, and short on facts.
Face it: this is a non-story and irrelevant.
I hope this is "credible" enough.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HkKz901exQ&eurl...
he has not done anything yet as a senator.....this is very sad...
There is a lot of name calling on this board but can anyone tell me why they would support this VP choice when confronted with these facts?
I don't want someone to tell me why not to vote for Obama, I am asking why someone would vote for Mccain with Gov. Palin as part of the ticker?
country. In my younger years I was a Republican, myself, but then
got too conservative and felt that was bad for the country .
I commend you for your letter, Sir.
funny you didn't answer the question just suggested that I frequent loony leftist blogs.
OK, I'll bite...but then I expect you to actually answer the question:
Is Anchorage Daily News a loony leftist site?
http://dwb.adn.com/news/alaska/matsu/story/9055...
How about the one on WSJ? Leftist site?
and lastly, making sure I check out everything I did look up the letter I found on Anchorage Daily news from Anne Kilkeeny on snopes
http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/sarahpalin.
this was from a women who is from the same small town. Here is a quote from the commentary:
"Sarah campaigned in Wasilla as a “fiscal conservative”. During her 6
years as Mayor, she increased general government expenditures by over
33%. During those same 6 years the amount of taxes collected by the
City increased by 38%. This was during a period of low inflation
(1996-2002). She reduced progressive property taxes and increased a
regressive sales tax which taxed even food. The tax cuts that she
promoted benefited large corporate property owners way more than they
benefited residents."
Now, I answered your question...how about you answer mine?
Hows that working out?
Is that what you do? You go around discussion threads and when people bring up real issues about your candidate in an honest attempt to have a discussion you dismiss their evidence as nonsense.
You are a clown. And a transparent one at that. I did hear from a friend that would be considered Left that Mccain offered people "McCain points" to troll around websites and muck up the discussion.
Congratulations...on this thread alone you must have at the very least earned a McCain baseball hat.
With Liberman (who is hardly a Democrat) the Dems hold the majority...without him they don't...and it is hardly a reasonable argument that the Dem's held the majority in any strategic sense given the fact that Liberman as his actions prove is basically a Republican -- His choice, althought it seems pretty dishonest to ask Obama to campaign for him when he needed his coattails and after he did now campaigns against him.
Silly Frank, ask your mom to read you a real newspaper once in a while, althought this is quite diverting knocking down such tripe. Now a True Republican (and true patriot) like Uncle Sam...that is a reasonable person I would truly enjoy debating the policies of true conservatives.
Obama won't get near the Whitehouse - so you better start looking for a job - the welfare checks will be ending soon.
The latest polls show that Obama is still ahead but his edge is narrowing. My bets are on Obama.
That's what I get when I mix two thoughts into once sentence. ;)
I don't have to tell you that the middle class, perhaps everyone but you, did a lot better between the years of 1990 and 2000 than they are doing now. You certainly can whine and cry about that but dems the facts and as much as you denigrate yourself by using the "New" Republican strategy of calling me names, you can't change them to suit your argument.
You CANNOT be registered a republican, like this writer claims to be, and vote for Obama. You'll be in for a rude awakening when you hit the polls on that Tuesday. Independents can choose which party they want to vote for ... but if you already have an affiliation you can't change it.
Didn't you know we can see all your posts along with your aliases?
Your party must be so happy you are representing them.
How lame.
Take your hate elsewhere loser!
You want to claim he has no experience .. What Experience did GW Bush have? What Experience does Queen Palin have other than being barefoot and pregnant half her career... good to know that her 17 y/o unwed daughter will be running around Washington ... hope mommy doesn't try to overturn Roe V Wade.
The Crsuty old McCAin .. Yes the former War Hero who was a prisoner of war. That shouldn't affect his judgment when it comes to a hostile nation?? Not that he is bitter about a war that was unpopular and he is now getting his just due... Nah he isnt bitter about that. Oh and no his temper isn't short he has the patience of a pit bull right Palin??? Or should we consider him a "Hockey Mom" without the lipstick .. Lets not mention his several bouts with cancer its good to know that he has recurring cancer and that if he died Palin would take over with her Brady Bunch family .... Good luck Repubelicans G.W. Has done you a world of good
In 2000 John McVain ran for president and You fruitards voted for Bush ... now McVain is back again so what makes you think he is right this time around??? Only Changes are he is Older and more prone to cancer and selected a Gun Toting . Baby Making nut job who was nothing more than a Mayor of a town of 9000 and governor for a couple months
So what has Changed since 2000?
Do you think you're up to leaving the safety of your Mom's basement and attempting to be a real man for once in your life?
I want to see you and your off-color comments removed from this site.
"We have a lot of work to do. It's a very hard struggle, particularly given the situation on the Iraq-Pakistan border." --referring to a border that does not exist, ABC News interview, July 21, 2008
Yeah - wise choice there - real brain surgeon this guy.
“The first thing that I would do is call in John Kerry, Bob Kerrey, Joe Biden, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, Dick Lugar, Chuck Hagel, and several others and say, ‘We’ve got to get foreign policy, national security issues back on track.’” (When asked the first thing he would do if elected President, 3/00)
Good choice your making there "aniti" - you clearly must still live at home with Mommy and have never had to balance a check book - your comments make that pretty obvious - keep sucking up to the racist "community organizer" and the plagerist - you all make quite a team and will be ready to commit suicide come November when your welfare checks run out.
It's tough to know those welfare checks will be running out soon huh?