-
Website
http://www.eagletribune.com/ -
Original page
http://www.eagletribune.com/permalink/local_story_268125056.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
skepsis22
983 comments · 356 points
-
BibleProphecy
1284 comments · 173 points
-
kat333
1729 comments · 579 points
-
Commentard
2625 comments · 872 points
-
Shadowen
2458 comments · 2356 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Windham representative leads fight against gay marriage
2 days ago · 471 comments
-
Library custodian says he grew pot for personal use
1 day ago · 105 comments
-
Chief assessor Vega demoted by Lantigua
1 day ago · 90 comments
-
Three fired on Lantigua's first day
1 day ago · 165 comments
-
Police: Andover library custodian booked on pot growing charges
1 day ago · 140 comments
-
Windham representative leads fight against gay marriage
From your perspective, what can we do to get people to change this mindset? What can we do to make a third party a viable option?
I follow the Libertarian Party fairly closely, and media bias or not they do not do enough to get their message across. So this isn't entirely a problem that can be blamed on the powers that be in this country.
How do we fix this problem? I know there are plenty of people who would agree with you and I that neither of the two major candidates represent what they believe. How do we reach them and show them that other choices do exist?
I know part of the anger stems from disappointment and frustration with GWB. I don't feel that these two parties can be united given the wide differences in opinion and sentiment. It's time for a change, but how do we get people to realize that?
From what I can see, people are afraid to think outside the box (i.e., the traditional two-party system). They think if they vote for someone like Bob Barr, they're taking votes away from McCain and they don't want the Democrat to win so they reluctantly vote for McCain. Too bad so many people have that mindset.
I too am a Libertarian and am not sure why their story (or the story for any other 3rd-party candidate) isn't more publicized. Part of it is funding, I'm sure. I also truly feel that the media is to blame for 90% of this as they mostly favor more liberal candidates and don't advertise other choices. People are too gullible and don't want to think or do research for themselves; they're too busy with their lives. They'd rather just vote for who Paris Hilton or Oprah thinks should be president. We have to change the sheep mentality.
Volunteering for a 3rd-party campaigner will help. The more people out there spreading the word about 3rd-party candidates, the more people will hear about them. They'll probably find another candidate whose views closely match their own.
Is this a fact you're proud of or is your memory failing?
So I guess what you're saying is that we should all just stick with the two-party system which is not working? This traditional system may have worked 100 or 200 years ago but is not working today. Why should Americans only be limited to 2 candidates?
There's no doubt in my mind Gore would have won without those third party (no--8-party!) candidates murking up the ballot.
I'm all for election reform--but how would adding a third party to the system "reform" it?
Many of us are tired of the same old rhetoric and the failed promises only made to sway our votes.
I own properties in both NH and MA btw, however neither is in Lawrence. (or Methuen for that matter).
Many of us are sick and tired of the same old broken record from both parties. People want change and they're not going to get real change from either candidate.
Brought to you by your 'good friends' at Wall Street.
No Paul or Nader Main Street USA,
nor Cynthia McKinney.
The two party system is completely broken. If we don't do something about it soon our country will be in for a rude awakening.
Democras will restore peace and bring tranquillty to our homes and the world.
The Arizona Republican senator said he will suspend his presidential campaign on Thursday to return to Washington to help with bailout negotiations. He urged Obama to do the same.
McCain proves to be a true leader he gets my vote. now watach the MSM they will try to say McCain and Obama suspend their campaign but it was McCain that did it First and this is the TRUTH McCain/Palin are For America my hat is off to them McCain just got 5 more votes
Are you on welfare? Live in lawrence?
All politicians are rich. How can they relate to middle or lower class people?
Could you CUT AND PASTE more of your Conservative drivel for us later?
McCain is now proving that he is incapable of LEADING, he is a runner.
And who the heck is MSM? And will they give us a bailout?
He never suspended his campaign....his numbers were low and he needed the attention!
What we need right now is!
JOHN McSAME!!!
he'll just continue the same failed agenda of the Bushies.
RAPE AND PILLAGE!!!
Why can't we get more info on Palin? She is apparently been told by the repubes "to know her role, stay in the kitchen and keep your mouth shut!"
I also work hard.
Silly liberal. Paychecks are for WORKERS!!
Just tell me--what's up with your apostrophe key?
This isn't selfless service to country--this is just a sleazy political move made for political gain.
THIS MESS, 8 YEARS IN THE MAKING, CANNOT BE ADDRESSED ON THURSDAY, OR MONDAY, ONLY ON THIS FRIDAY.
P.S. Gas was $1.46 when Bill left, and GWB took office.
THIS MESS, 8 YEARS IN THE MAKING, CANNOT BE ADDRESSED ON THURSDAY, OR MONDAY, ONLY ON THIS FRIDAY.
P.S. Gas was $1.46 when Bill left, and GWB took office.
"I wish we had 0% interest rates" John McCain?
When this country is in it's greatest financial crisis in 80 years?
Very few people are truly undecided, it's all about the ideology.
Did you watch the Republican convention? Read press releases from any of McCain's advisers for the last month? All its been is whining about the liberal media, whining about liberal elites, whining about non-existent sexism from the Obama campaign. You can't ask Sarah Palin to pass a mooseburger without being called a member of the phantom "liberal elite." The worst kind of sexism is the kind coming from McCain and his buddies right now and it is sickening.
Don't believe me? Go see for yourself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCja99KpjWU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l04uWvJJlSE
You've got the internet---check your sources!!!
YOU will pay LESS taxes under OBAMA'S plan than McCain's tax plan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2r1NpI-ASpU
So I should write in Ron Paul? Judging by your sound bite, your going to vote for Communist's candidate. That is
not going to happen. I wouldn't be able to sleep if I woke up to find out that comrade Obama was going to run America and it was because he won by one vote.
I have never missed an election or primary, since I started voting in my teens. I've worked too hard to see the little I have redistributed to people who never worked at all.
Go here to see what I'm talking about.
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-global-tax...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_poverty_act
Perhaps you should check your sources a little more carefully next time.
Accuracy in Media? Ironic isn't it? Kinda like Fox News claiming to be "Fair and Balanced".
I'm not voting Obama or McCain. Like I said, evil is evil. I wouldn't be able to sleep knowing that I had a part in voting for either of these two men to lead our country. This election I will be joining those who are absolutely fed up with what Washington has done to our country, I will be voting for a third party.
Check this out.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE....
A better way might be to put McCain in. Then get real interested in the Republican party. Get in there and curb it's pandering to big business. We'd all be better off if the Republicans pandered to small business and nurtured it. You see, if smaller business provided most of the people's income, things would be better. How you ask? A healthy and natural competition for both workers and markets. A smaller concern has less overhead and less pressure to find money to support a vast management .
this frees up revenues for better wages and benefits.
BTW these large corporations are giving lots of money to Obama.
If you don't believe me check for yourself.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bara...
So you see simply voting for someone who vaguely keeps screaming "change, change, change" will not help. You either have to literally take back a party from the roots up, or start a new one.
I had hope with Obama at first. But the more I learned, the less I liked him. One of the most effective candidates I voted for in my life was black. Just a selectman, but what a guy. He got up and told the entrenched school district where the dog died. People were losing their jobs and the school district wanted a big raise.
He got up at a meeting and told them to come down out of their ivory towers and face reality. Now that's a representative.
My biggest fear about Obama is we will become a Communist nation over night. Colin Powell, I could vote for , but not Obama.
My voting choice is to slow the process down. It can't be stopped until we have a multiple party system with possibly coalition government. Obamanation will be even worse, resulting in a one party system.
I predict that Obama will win. I predict that things will not get better. You see, anybody who will actually represent the people will get taken out in the primaries or in the case of John Kennedy, taken out during office. A coalition government would be much harder for special interest to control. And the willful removal of a leader, who be an unacceptable gamble that the special interest would find difficult to make. A coalition government of conservatives, labor, conservationist and liberals would have to earn their keep. Right now it's sit back and collect a big check for approving what has already been pre-approved.
You are a freakin' nutcase.
Oh and your story sounds like every racist I've ever known, "I have lots of black friends, so I'm not a racist...but."
How many starved when Russia first adopted Communism? You don't know, do you? Here is the answer millions! Check it out.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
And people actually want that to happen here?
Your idea about small business, frankly, sucks, which is why I think you are just trying to trick people into voting Republican with empty assertions. In fact, I'd say it is more Communist- in over-regulation of the free market by the government to prevent corporations from growing, a return to pre-industrial society plus the inevitable extreme economic protectionism to make sure our small businesses are protected from overseas companies, than anything Obama is proposing.
In the 1800's, Trust and Monopoly laws were enacted for a reason. Your candidate, Obama is receiving as much if not more corporate support than McCain. He tell you what you want to hear, but he takes money from big business.
check it out!
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2...
And to J
You keep reading and listening to what they want you to.
Your name calling and labeling is proof that you cannot use facts to prove your arguments.
http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/thefederalreserve...
"In June 1963 Kennedy took the ultimate step against the Fed by authorizing the issuance of more than $4 billion in ‘United States Notes’ through the U.S. Treasury, not the Federal Reserve."
- Jim Marrs, Rule By Secrecy
http://www.fdrs.org/quotes_on_john_f_kennedy.html
Have at it J, send some proof of the falsity of these sources.
It is easy to blame the current President for this economic crisis, but the truth of the matter is that this matter (housing bubble) started long before Mr. Bush came into office and there was only one party who chose to sit back and oppose the reforms set forth by our next great leader.
Also for all those people who went out and purchased homes beyond their means, you should be ashamed of yourselves. Look at the mess you have caused. Just a little personal responsiblity would have prevented this from happening! As for illegal immigration, I can think of 14 million ways America can save some money. McCain/Palin 2009 Bringing America Back!
More bank failures to come, like Washington Mutual today. Do not believe what is being fed through the republican controlled media, get out now and save what you can!!!
please don't jump.
If you want to put someone in office put a person who is proud of his country, someone that will pledge allegiance to the people and better yet, be sworn in on the Bible rather than the Koran.
Also, ask yourself this.....How will a person with Muslim roots defend America against muslim terrorists?
I guess if you believe that we can have 3rd party talks with terrorists....Vote Obama
Think twice before voting for this man, the world will pay the ultimate price and it will hold a price tag more valuable than money......our freedom!
Barack Husein Osama wants to raise taxes on people he considers rich, his definition of rich is people making over $100K a year--which really isn't even that much money. He wants to raise cap gains, which will impact anyone who transacts stocks (which is 100,000,000 million Americans including myself), he also wants to raise the social security wage base which is currently at $102K and has already increased an average of 3.7 % per year over the last 8 years (a $22K increase over that period). I find this to be particularly objectionable since it's most likely that I won't be able receive a social security dictionary commensurate with my input.
I work way to hard to give increasing portions of my income to welfare mothers or socialized medicine--which doesn't even work well.
If you don't earn enough money go to college, if you still don't make enough go get a graduate degree. If you aren't the college type learn a trade and join a union (they provide jobs and protection for the laziest Americans).
I firmly believe that this country offers the opportunities to better you position in life, you just have to want to it badly enough to earn it. It would seem as though the democrats want to take money from the people who have earned it and give it to those who haven't. If that's the kind of America that will make you proud then you should cast your phone for the admitted cocaine user Barack Husein Osama.
Even George says, "Our entire economy is in danger".
Wish I could live in your bubble.
"I thought that was terrible, by the way," Biden told Couric. "I didn't know we did it. If I'd had anything to do with it, we'd have never done it.
He later flip-flopped on his critisim of Osama saying: "I was asked about an ad I'd never seen, reacting merely to press reports. As I said right then, I knew there was nothing intentionally personal in the criticism of Senator McCain's views which look backwards not forwards and are out of touch with the new economic challenges we face today.
"Having now reviewed the ad, it is even more clear to me that given the disgraceful tenor of Senator McCain's ads and their persistent falsehoods, his campaign is in no position to criticize, especially when they continue to distort Barack's votes on an issue as personal as keeping kids safe from sexual predators."
Which is it: terrible or the right thing to do?
There is a reason people struggle and sometimes even break the law to get here. It's the ability to have a chance at success. Something unavailable elsewhere. They are leaving either an impoverished republic or a socialist republic.
Unfortunately more and more of them are becoming disillusioned with the way things are getting here. One good thing about an Obama
administration, they won't have to build walls to keep illegal immigrants out anymore, because they will see no need to come here. He'll send them the money via instruments such as the U.N. and his Global Poverty Act.
He will truly implement "from each, according to his ability, to each according to his need."
Americans will truly lose the desire to produce and that will accelerate our downfall.
on 9/21/08 Biden Called Himself A "Hard-Coal Miner" And Said It Was "Nice To Be Back In Coal Country." "'I hope you won't hold it against me, but I am a hard-coal miner, anthracite coal, Scranton, Pa.,' Biden said. 'It's nice to be back in coal country.
Which is it?
Glad to see my light-hearted 2 line witty comment induced you to write an encyclopedia of drivel, no-one will read.
I will vote for the one who isn't so i don't need the debates.
Why does McCain have to be such a dunce at times?
On The Facts, Sen. Obama Strikes Out
by Michael Graham September 27, 2008 @ 08:44
Quite a few Obama supporters are upset that Sen. McCain repeatedly claimed that Sen. Obama was clueless about various issues ("Sen. Obama doesn't seem to understand...") Sen. Obama, for his part, repeatedly pointed out during the debate that Sen. McCain was right about various issues.
Interesting strategy.
But simple-minded American that I am, I'm more interested in whether or not Sen. McCain's observation about Barack is accurate. Did Sen. Obama show a lack of knowledge and understanding about the issues last night? Let's go to the transcript:
HENRY LOVES BARACK? Sen. Obama repeately claimed last night that former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger supported the Obama plan for presidential, face-to-face meetings with kooks like Castro and Iran's AhmedWhack-I-Job "without preconditions." As Sen. Obama put it:
Senator McCain mentioned Henry Kissinger, who's one of his advisers, who, along with five recent secretaries of state, just said that we should meet with Iran -- guess what -- without precondition. This is one of your own advisers....When we talk about preconditions -- and Henry Kissinger did say we should have contacts without preconditions -- the idea is that we do not expect to solve every problem before we initiate talks.
Well, here's what Kissinger himself had to say immediately after last night's debate:
"Senator McCain is right. I would not recommend the next President of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the Presidential level. My views on this issue are entirely compatible with the views of my friend Senator John McCain. We do not agree on everything, but we do agree that any negotiations with Iran must be geared to reality."
Strike one, Obama.
MCCAIN'S "TAX BREAKS FOR BIG OIL?" Sen. Obama repeated on stage twice what his ads say on TV every day:
John, you want to give oil companies another $4 billion...And if we want to talk about oil company profits, under your tax plan, John -- this is undeniable -- oil companies would get an additional $4 billion in tax breaks.
So, does Sen. McCain really want to give special tax breaks to Big Oil? Uh....no. Sen. McCain's plan is to cut taxes on ALL businesses (we currently have the 2nd highest corporate tax rate in the industrialized world). So, yes, given that oil companies pay hundreds of billions in taxes right now--they paid more in taxes than they earned in profits last year--if every business pays a lower tax rate, that would include people in the oil business. It also includes people in the office supply, online porn and ox-breeding industries, too. Why isn't Sen. Obama pointing out McCain's plan to "give breaks to Big Ox?"
Now, it is true that Congress recently voted on an energy bill with tax cuts specifically cutting taxes for oil companies. And, as Sen. McCain pointed out last night, he voted against it. Sen. Obama voted for it.
Strike two.
OBAMA'S "95% SOLUTION": Sen. Obama said again last night that he's got a tax cut on the way for almost every American alive:'
So my attitude is, we've got to grow the economy from the bottom up. What I've called for is a tax cut for 95 percent of working families, 95 percent.
Sounds great, right? Only one problem: a lot of those "working families" don't pay federal income taxes. How are you going to cut taxes they don't pay? According to the National Taxpayer's Union, the top half of American taxpayers pay 97% of all federal income taxes, leaving the other half to pay a combined 3%. Most of those familes pay no federal income taxes at all. Sen. Obama isn't proposing a tax cut--tax rates on the vast majority of Americans will either remain the same or go up under Sen. Obama's plan. Instead, he's planning on sending those non-payers an income tax "rebate" check--despite the fact that they never "bated" any income taxes in the first place.
That's not a tax cut. That's welfare.
Strike three, Sen. Obama, and we're not even close to being out. More fact errors from Sen. Obama coming soon...
George Bush is one of the greatest presidents we ever had. A true patriot supports their president and country no matter what, right or wrong! Anyone who thinks differently is stupider.
This is the saddest national election that I have ever witnessed. Change for the sake of change, hope against hope and it looks like we will be stuck with a Marxist in the White House. What Russia threw off in the 80's we are going to embrace.
What a mess.
Also, there are many other religions. Why are you assuming that he goes to a Catholic church? I go to a Protestant church and have people that I consider close enough to be family. Is that such a bad thing? Just because someone goes to church, doesn't automatically make them a fanatic.
Our parents went through the depression to make a better life for us?
On the contrary, they didn't have a choice.
And while enduring it, I'm sure they thought...
"Wow, this is surely going to give our kids a better life!"
This country is on it's way to hell.
And it's people like you who will in the end pave the road there.
I think it's interesting how many people think McCain has one foot in the grave already. The title of that video indicates that Sarah is running for President.
Now, let's not forget that she would also become the President of the Senate & could potentially break tie votes in the chamber.
Genius! pure Genius!
At least smarter than Bush.
Very scared.
Please watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvesa49zSIM
Fact - Obama has sponsored 136 bills since January 2005. Sponsored means, in the United States Congress, a senator or representative that introduces a bill or amendment and is its chief advocate. Two of those bills became law. Additionally, Obama co-sponsored 619 bills during that same time period.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack [IL] (introduced 10/27/2005) Cosponsors (1)
Latest Major Action: 10/27/2005 Passed/agreed to in Senate. Status: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Yeah, he's an impact player!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/palin-...
Look up any bill, your Rep or Senators sponsorships and their voting records.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Thanks for the inspiration, Wake up--but I'm not playing dueling bills with you.
The fact that a corrupt Chicago Machine politician "made a U.S. senator" out of Barack Osama
How Barack Osama won his first election by having his lawyers knock all his opponents off the ballot on technicalities
Osama's support for a grotesque "infanticide" law that was too extreme even for Nancy Pelosi
The Tony Rezko connection: "I've never done any favors for him," says Obama about convicted developer Tony Rezko. Oh, but he has...
The admitted cocaine use.
But for everyone else, be aware he is copying and pasting hateful false propaganda:
http://74.125.45.104/search?q=cache:EDNx2VbyweU...
Next time please footnote.
:rolleyes:
Osama discusses his drug use, including cocaine, from his high school years into college: here's what he had to say about himself: "Junkie. Pothead. That's where I'd been headed: the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man. . . . I got high [to] push questions of who I was out of my mind."
The above is an excerpt from "Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance" Written by Barack Hussein Osama
Hey wait a minute.....
What about your boy Georgie and his alcohol abuse and (supposed) cocaine use?
Any modern upcoming president (or person, for that matter) is going to have some behavior from his adolescent or college years come back to haunt him.
It doesn't make him unqualified to serve as an adult.
I didn't hold Bush's alcohol and supposed drug issues against him---there were plenty of other things...